TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a partner's share of profit from an unregistered firm, though exempt from tax in his hands because the firm has already been taxed, can still be included in his total income for the purpose of setting it off against losses from registered firms and for determining the applicable rate of tax on other income; (ii) whether the losses from registered firms, once so set off against the partner's share of profit from the unregistered firm, cease to be available for carry forward under section 24.
Issue (i): Whether a partner's share of profit from an unregistered firm, though exempt from tax in his hands because the firm has already been taxed, can still be included in his total income for the purpose of setting it off against losses from registered firms and for determining the applicable rate of tax on other income.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of section 14(2)(a) gave immunity from tax in the partner's hands in respect of profits of an unregistered firm on which tax had already been paid by the firm, but section 16(1)(a) directed that sums exempted under section 14(2) were nevertheless to be included in computing total income. The combined effect was that the partner's share in the profits of the unregistered firm, though not directly taxable, entered the computation of total income for rate purposes and could be adjusted against losses from registered firms in determining the taxable amount and the rate applicable to other income.
Conclusion: Yes. The share income from the unregistered firm was rightly taken into account for computation of total income and rate purposes, and this issue was decided against the assessees.
Issue (ii): Whether the losses from registered firms, once so set off against the partner's share of profit from the unregistered firm, cease to be available for carry forward under section 24.
Analysis: Section 24 dealt with a separate subject, namely the carry forward of business losses to subsequent year or years until absorbed in profits or until the statutory limit was reached. The adjustment of exempt income against losses for the purpose of computing total income and rate did not amount to an absorption of the loss so as to extinguish the statutory right to carry it forward. Reading sections 14(2) and 16(1)(a) as destroying that right would improperly nullify section 24 in appropriate cases.
Conclusion: No. The losses of the registered firms could still be carried forward, and this issue was decided in favour of the assessees.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent that the right to carry forward the registered-firm losses was preserved, while the inclusion of the unregistered firm's share income for total income and rate purposes was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Income exempt from tax in the hands of a partner may still be included in total income for rate computation where the statute so provides, but such inclusion does not destroy the independent statutory right to carry forward business losses under the loss-carry-forward provision.
TaxTMI 
