Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal applied the correct legal test in valuing goodwill for excess profits tax purposes and whether a question of law arose requiring a reference to the High Court.
Analysis: Goodwill is not confined to the value of a leasehold or to locality alone. It is a composite asset derived from several elements, including reputation, connection, mode of conduct of the business, service, standing, and the power to attract custom. The Tribunal had approached the matter too narrowly by treating the leasehold value as the principal, and in effect the only, measure of goodwill. That approach ignored relevant considerations which necessarily enter into the valuation of goodwill in a business such as a theatre or restaurant. Since the legal test governing goodwill was not correctly applied, the controversy raised a question of law fit for reference.
Conclusion: The Tribunal erred in law in its approach to goodwill, and the High Court ought to have required a statement of the case on the question raised.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the legal issue concerning valuation of goodwill, and the matter was remitted for proper consideration according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Goodwill must be valued as a composite business asset by considering all relevant factors that attract custom, and not by restricting the inquiry to locality or leasehold value alone.