Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a non-resident assessee who failed to file a return after a general notice under section 22(1) could be proceeded against under section 34(1)(a) within eight years, or whether the case fell only under section 34(1)(b).
Analysis: The expression used in section 22(1) applied to every person whose total income exceeded the taxable limit and did not exclude non-residents. A general notice under section 22(1), read with the prescribed rules, created an obligation to file a return. If the assessee did not comply, that omission attracted section 34(1)(a). Section 34(1)(b) was confined to cases where there had been no such omission or failure to make a return. The absence of knowledge of the general notice by a non-resident did not justify reading a limitation into the provision which the statute did not express.
Conclusion: The notices and reassessment proceedings were within limitation under section 34(1)(a), and the assessee's contention failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A general notice under section 22(1) binds every person with taxable income, including a non-resident, and failure to file a return pursuant to that notice constitutes omission or failure attracting reassessment under section 34(1)(a).