Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for earned income relief under section 2(6AA) of the Income-tax Act, the share income of minor sons included in the father's total income could be treated as earned income of the father, even though the minors themselves were not actively engaged in the conduct of the business.
Analysis: The definition of earned income covered income included in an assessee's income from another person, but only if the income answered the statutory description of earned income. The controlling requirement was that the income must have been earned by the assessee, or, in the case of a firm, by the assessee as a partner actively engaged in the conduct of the business. The inclusive part of the definition did not dispense with that condition. The court held that the words "such income" referred back to earned income as so defined, and that the active participation requirement applied equally where the income of another person was included in the assessee's total income.
Conclusion: The share income of the minor sons was not separately eligible for earned income relief in the father's hands merely because it was included in his total income; only the income actually earned by the assessee through his own active participation as a partner qualified. The answer given by the High Court was therefore upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of earned income relief, income included in an assessee's total income from another person qualifies only if it satisfies the statutory conditions of earned income, including the requirement that the assessee himself, or the assessee as an actively engaged partner, earned it.