1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellant Wins Fee Battle: Only One Set Required for Appeal</h1> The Supreme Court ruled that the appellant was required to pay only one set of court fees for their appeal, not nine sets as initially instructed. The ... Appeal To Supreme Court, Assessment Order, Court Fee The Supreme Court held that the appellant should only pay one set of court fees for their appeal, not nine sets as directed by the Deputy Registrar. The court distinguished the present case from previous cases cited by the Registrar, stating that the appellant challenged multiple assessment orders in one petition, constituting a single proceeding. The court ordered the office to take necessary action to refund any excess charges paid.