Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 18 of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957 rendered the estate of a person who died before the Act came into force liable to expenditure-tax and enabled assessment and recovery through the legal representatives.
Analysis: The charging provision imposed expenditure-tax on expenditure incurred in the previous year, while section 18 declared the liability of a deceased person's estate and provided machinery for assessment and recovery through the executor, administrator or other legal representative. The language of section 18 was held not to be confined to deaths occurring after commencement of the Act. By applying the scheme of sections 13, 14 and 15 to legal representatives, Parliament had provided the necessary machinery to assess and collect tax from the estate of a person who died before the Act began to operate. The analogy drawn from section 24B(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 did not support restricting section 18 to future deaths.
Conclusion: Section 18 did render the estate of a person who died before the Act came into force liable to expenditure-tax, and the respondents were not entitled to resist assessment on that ground.