Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amounts received by the assessee under the mining lease were income chargeable to tax. (ii) Whether the receipts were exempt as casual and non-recurring receipts.
Analysis: The receipts were paid under a covenant directly connected with the rent and royalty payable under the lease. They were not collected by the assessee as agent for the Government, nor was the payer shown to have discharged a statutory liability on behalf of the Government. The amounts were in fact received and appropriated by the assessee under the contract, and the possibility of a later claim for refund by the payer did not alter their character in the year of receipt. The exemption for casual and non-recurring receipts was not available because the payments were not accidental, fortuitous, or shown to be non-recurring.
Conclusion: The receipts constituted income and were chargeable to tax. The exemption for casual and non-recurring receipts was not applicable, and the finding was against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed in full, and the assessment of the disputed receipts as taxable income was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts received under a contractual covenant closely linked to rent and royalty are taxable as income when received and appropriated by the assessee, unless a specific exemption applies; a receipt does not become casual and non-recurring merely because it may later be claimed back by the payer.