Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a change of the assessee's accounting year with the Income-tax Officer's consent, the previous year could lawfully be taken as a period exceeding twelve months and the whole of that period assessed to tax at the applicable rate.
Analysis: The expression "previous year" under section 2(11)(i)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 ordinarily refers to a twelve-month period, but the proviso permits a variation of the meaning of the previous year with the Income-tax Officer's consent on such conditions as he thinks fit. Reading that provision with the charging provision in section 3, the Court held that there is no legal bar to the previous year, for the changed accounting year, covering the full intervening period between the old and new accounting dates. The Officer may impose a condition ensuring that the entire income of that extended period is brought to charge, and neither two previous years for the same assessment year nor a different tax rate for part of the period can be created by such consent.
Conclusion: The Income-tax Officer was entitled to sanction the change on the footing that the previous year for the relevant assessment year consisted of twenty-one months, and the income of that entire period was assessable at the statutory rate; the contention of the assessee failed.