Income-tax liability as debt owed under wealth-tax valuation rules, including advance tax demand and tax provisions.

Income-tax liability and advance tax demand were treated as debts owed on the relevant valuation date for Wealth-tax Act section 2(m) purposes. The amount set apart as provision for future tax liability was held to be an existing obligation on the valuation date, and the final instalment due under section 18A of the Indian Income-tax Act likewise formed part of the assessee's liabilities in computing net wealth. One appeal succeeded on the first question, while the connected challenge failed on the second; Shah J. agreed on the second issue but dissented on the first.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the amount set apart by the assessee as provision for future tax liability, after deduction of the last instalment of demand under section 18A(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, constituted a debt owed on the valuation date within section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act; (ii) Whether the final instalment due under section 18A of the Indian Income-tax Act constituted a debt owed for computing the assessee's net wealth on the relevant valuation date.

Issue (i): Whether the amount set apart by the assessee as provision for future tax liability, after deduction of the last instalment of demand under section 18A(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, constituted a debt owed on the valuation date within section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act.

Analysis: The legal position applied was that liability to pay tax under the Indian Income-tax Act amounts to a debt owed on the relevant valuation date for purposes of section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act. On that basis, the amount provisioned by the assessee towards its tax liability was treated as an existing obligation on the valuation date.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in the affirmative and the assessee succeeded on this question.

Issue (ii): Whether the final instalment due under section 18A of the Indian Income-tax Act constituted a debt owed for computing the assessee's net wealth on the relevant valuation date.

Analysis: The demand for advance payment of tax under section 18A was treated as a debt within the meaning of section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act. The amount due as the final instalment therefore formed part of the assessee's liabilities on the valuation date.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in the affirmative and the revenue's challenge on this question failed.

Final Conclusion: The decision affirms that income-tax liability and advance tax demand can constitute debts owed for wealth-tax valuation purposes, resulting in success on one appeal and failure on the connected appeal.

Concurring/Dissenting Opinion: Shah J. agreed that the appeal concerning the second question should fail, but dissented on the first question and would also have dismissed that appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: A tax liability or advance tax demand payable under the Income-tax Act is a debt owed on the relevant valuation date for the purposes of section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act.

---