TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Allows Rebate Claim Despite Delay, Emphasizes Commissioner's Control. Clarifies Time Limits.</h1> <h3>IN RE: DRAWCANS (P) LTD.</h3> IN RE: DRAWCANS (P) LTD. - 1998 (103) E.L.T. 189 (G. O. I.) The judgment pertains to a rebate claim filed by M/s. Drawcans Pvt. Ltd. The claim was initially rejected as time-barred by the Maritime Commissioner. The Delhi High Court case of Modi Rubber Ltd. v. UOI was cited to support the claim that the filing before the jurisdictional Asstt. Commissioner was a bona fide mistake. The Government condoned the delay in filing the revision application and allowed it, noting that the jurisdictional Asstt. Commissioner had control over the applicants' claim. The judgment also highlighted the time limits for deciding rebate claims under the Central Excise Act, 1944.
TaxTMI 