Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order permitting re-export of the goods on payment of fine was invalid, and whether interference was called for in review under Section 129-DD of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The order proceeded on the footing that goods liable to confiscation under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962 could attract Section 125, under which fine in lieu of confiscation may be imposed and conditions may be attached to the redemption, including re-export of the goods. The absence of a separate provision in Chapter XI dealing with re-shipment did not make the order invalid. The matter was also viewed as one turning largely on discretion and quantum, especially given the age of the case.
Conclusion: The order permitting re-export on fine was upheld and no interference was warranted.