Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on disposable syringes and needles packed with injections and whether the Revenue could deny such credit when the value of those items was included in the assessable value of the final product.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the nature of the goods and the treatment adopted by the Revenue. The appellants had cleared the injections in unipacks with disposable syringes and needles, and the value of those items was included in the assessable value. The Revenue itself treated the packing and treatment of the medicines as part of the manufacturing process under Chapter Note V of Chapter 30. In that situation, the same goods could not be treated as relevant for duty valuation and yet be excluded for credit purposes. The earlier decisions in the appellants' own case were distinguished because they proceeded on a different factual basis, namely, credit claimed as packing material.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on disposable syringes and needles was admissible, and denial of credit was unsustainable.