Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether skimmed milk powder cleared for manufacture of products like Horlicks and Boost, after being regenerated into liquid milk, was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 38/78-C.E. dated 1-3-1978.
Analysis: The notification exempted skimmed milk powder only when it was used for regeneration of liquid milk within the same factory, or elsewhere subject to proof of intended use for regeneration of liquid milk and compliance with Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The wording of the notification, read in its plain terms, confined the exemption to skimmed milk powder used for the production of liquid milk and did not extend it to cases where the regenerated milk was only an intermediate stage in making other products. The interpretation adopted by the Gujarat High Court on the same notification supported this construction, and the contrary Andhra Pradesh decision concerned a different factual and legal setting.
Conclusion: The respondents were not entitled to exemption when the skimmed milk powder was ultimately used in products other than liquid milk. The exemption applied only where the skimmed milk was regenerated into liquid milk as such.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification expressed in clear terms must be applied according to its plain language, and where the notification limits relief to use in regeneration of liquid milk, the exemption cannot be extended to cases where liquid milk is only an intermediary stage in manufacture of other products.