Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rebate on export of excisable goods is admissible when the inputs were procured duty free under the export-input procedure, and whether goods manufactured from such inputs can be exported on payment of duty and claim rebate under the rebate procedure.
Analysis: The final products were admittedly dutiable and were exported on payment of appropriate central excise duty. The input-procurement facility under the relevant export-input procedure did not contain any condition that goods manufactured from duty-free inputs must necessarily be exported only without payment of duty under bond. The rebate notification applicable to duty-paid exports also did not exclude such goods merely because the inputs had been obtained duty free. The two procedures were treated as complementary, and the rebate sanctioning authority was not required to deny rebate on that ground.
Conclusion: Rebate was admissible and the objection that the exports had to be made only under bond was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The revision applications failed and the appellate order allowing rebate on the duty-paid exports was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the exported final product is cleared on payment of duty and the relevant notifications do not impose a prohibition, rebate cannot be denied merely because the inputs were obtained duty free under an export-input procedure.