1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court affirms CEGAT decision, emphasizing manufacturer declarations for MODVAT credit</h1> The High Court upheld the decision of the CEGAT, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the appeal by the Revenue. The Court emphasized the ... Cenvat/Modvat - Declaration Issues:Allowance of credit for inputs not declared in modvat declaration under Rule 57-G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Allowance of credit for inputs not declared in modvat declarationThe petitioner utilized plastic granules received from a manufacturer for manufacturing the end-product. The petitioner claimed MODVAT credit for the granules under the definition of waste and scrap of plastics. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim, stating the granules did not qualify as waste and scrap of plastics. The Appellate Authority, however, allowed the appeal based on judgments from the Central Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) Chandigarh and Cochin Benches.Issue 2: Challenge by the departmentThe department challenged the appellate order before the CEGAT, which also rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue. The CEGAT considered the declaration made by the manufacturer of the granules, classifying them as waste and scrap of plastics, which was accepted by the Central Excise Authorities. The Tribunal held that the Excise Authorities could not take a different view than the one accepted for the consigner-manufacturer. The Tribunal emphasized the consistency in interpretation by the Excise Department for the same item.JudgmentThe High Court upheld the decision of the CEGAT, emphasizing the acceptance of the manufacturer's declaration by the Excise Authorities. The Court ruled against the Revenue, stating that the Excise Department cannot provide conflicting interpretations for the same item. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.This judgment highlights the importance of consistent interpretation by the Excise Authorities and the significance of manufacturer declarations in determining the classification of goods for MODVAT credit eligibility.