1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed: Confiscation of Electronic Goods Overturned as Non-Smuggled</h1> The High Court of Bombay dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CESTAT order setting aside the confiscation of electronic consumer goods. The Tribunal ... Confiscation and penalty - Non-notified goods - Burden of proof - Held that: - The Tribunal has held that in the absence of such evidence, the confiscation order cannot be sustained - the finding recorded by the Tribunal are findings of fact and no substantial question of law arises out of the said order passed by the Tribunal - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. The High Court of Bombay dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CESTAT order setting aside the confiscation of electronic consumer goods. The Tribunal found that the goods were non-notified and revenue failed to prove they were smuggled. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's findings. The appeal was dismissed with no costs.