Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the requirement of pre-deposit under the Central Excise Act is protected by Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
Analysis: The decision followed the Supreme Court ruling that payment of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not fall within the categories covered by Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Accordingly, the statutory protection under Section 22 was held to be unavailable against the pre-deposit direction.
Conclusion: The challenge to the pre-deposit condition failed, and the protection under Section 22 was held not to apply.