Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether conversion of straight grade bitumen into blown grade bitumen by the oxidation or blowing process amounted to manufacture, and whether blown grade bitumen produced from duty-paid straight grade bitumen was liable to excise duty.
Analysis: The Board's circulars consistently treated straight grade bitumen and blown grade bitumen as varieties of bitumen, and the classification under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 depended on the mode of packing. The Tribunal's finding that no new commercial commodity with a new name, character or use came into existence by the blowing process was accepted, and the revenue could not take a stand contrary to its own circulars. The earlier contrary view was distinguished because the relevant circulars had not been placed before the Tribunal in that case.
Conclusion: Conversion of straight grade bitumen into blown grade bitumen did not amount to manufacture on the facts considered, and duty was not chargeable where the blown grade bitumen was produced from duty-paid straight grade bitumen in the manner covered by the Board's circulars.