1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court rejects application on steel mill capacity rules, emphasizes Rule 4, remands for re-consideration.</h1> The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad rejected an application regarding the determination of annual production capacity under the Hot-Re-Rolling Steel ... Reference to High Court - Production capacity based duty The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad addressed the scope of Rules 3, 4, and 5 of the Hot-Re-Rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 in the context of fixation of annual production capacity. The Tribunal remanded the matter for re-consideration based on previous judgments, emphasizing the application of Rule 4 over Rule 5. The Court rejected the application as it found no question of law arising from the Tribunal's order, stating that the determination of annual capacity is a factual matter to be decided by the concerned authority in accordance with the rules.