Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Classification of D.E.P.B. Credits as Taxable Goods Upheld under Sales Tax Law</h1> <h3>JINDAL DRUGS LIMITED Versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA</h3> JINDAL DRUGS LIMITED Versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2004 (178) E.L.T. 105 (Bom.) , [2008] 17 VST 164 (Bom) Issues Involved:1. Classification of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (D.E.P.B.) credit as 'goods' under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.2. Validity of the amendment to Schedule 'C' of the Bombay Sales Tax Act to include D.E.P.B. credit.Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of D.E.P.B. Credit as 'Goods':Factual Background:The petitioners, a company engaged in the manufacture, sale, and export of pharmaceuticals, challenged the inclusion of D.E.P.B. credit as 'goods' under the Bombay Sales Tax Act. The D.E.P.B. Scheme aims to neutralize the incidence of basic customs duty on the import content of export products by granting duty credits.Petitioners' Arguments:The petitioners contended that D.E.P.B. credit is not 'goods' as defined under Section 2(13) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act. They argued that D.E.P.B. credits are akin to money or actionable claims, both of which are excluded from the definition of 'goods.' They likened D.E.P.B. credits to bank account credits, asserting that such credits fall within the scope of 'money' and are thus not taxable under the Act.Respondents' Arguments:The respondents argued that D.E.P.B. credit is a movable property with intrinsic value, freely transferable in the market, and thus qualifies as 'goods.' They emphasized that sales tax is levied on the sale or purchase of D.E.P.B. credits, not on the credit itself. They cited the Delhi High Court's judgment in Philco Exports, which upheld the taxation of D.E.P.B. credits.Court's Consideration:The court examined the definition of 'goods' under Section 2(13) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act and concluded that D.E.P.B. credits do not qualify as 'money.' The court noted that 'money' refers to currency that can be freely exchanged for debts or commodities, which is not the case with D.E.P.B. credits. The court also rejected the argument that D.E.P.B. credits are actionable claims, as they represent a determined amount of liability that does not require legal action for realization.Conclusion:The court held that D.E.P.B. credits are neither money nor actionable claims but are movable property with intrinsic value. Therefore, they fall within the definition of 'goods' under the Bombay Sales Tax Act and are subject to sales tax.2. Validity of the Amendment to Schedule 'C':Factual Background:The State of Maharashtra amended Schedule 'C' of the Bombay Sales Tax Act to include D.E.P.B. credit as taxable goods, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1997. The petitioners challenged the validity of this amendment.Petitioners' Arguments:The petitioners argued that the amendment was arbitrary and beyond the provisions of the Act. They contended that D.E.P.B. credits do not qualify as 'goods' and thus cannot be included in Schedule 'C.'Respondents' Arguments:The respondents defended the amendment, asserting that it was consistent with the provisions of the Act. They emphasized that D.E.P.B. credits are recognized as goods in commercial parlance and are subject to sales tax in various states. They also pointed out that the petitioners had previously paid taxes on the sale of D.E.P.B. credits, indicating their understanding of the credits as taxable goods.Court's Consideration:The court examined the legislative intent and the statutory scheme of the Bombay Sales Tax Act. It noted that the Act aims to levy tax on the sale or purchase of certain goods, and the inclusion of D.E.P.B. credits aligns with this objective. The court also considered the petitioners' prior tax payments on D.E.P.B. credits as an acknowledgment of their taxable nature.Conclusion:The court upheld the validity of the amendment to Schedule 'C' of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, concluding that D.E.P.B. credits are goods and are subject to sales tax. The petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no order as to costs.Final Judgment:The petition challenging the classification of D.E.P.B. credits as goods and the validity of the amendment to Schedule 'C' of the Bombay Sales Tax Act was dismissed. The court confirmed that D.E.P.B. credits are taxable goods under the Act.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found