Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to recall its ex parte order passed in the appeal, and whether any question of law arose for reference under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The Tribunal recalled the ex parte order after being satisfied that the respondents had not appeared for reasons beyond their control and that a rehearing on merits was justified. Reliance was placed on Rule 41 of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 and the principle that a tribunal empowered to do justice may set aside an ex parte order where sufficient cause for non-appearance is shown. Since the recall was made to secure a hearing on merits and no prejudice was found, no referable question of law survived.
Conclusion: The Tribunal had jurisdiction to recall the ex parte order, and no question of law arose for reference.