Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a penalty under section 271AAB could survive where the statutory notice did not specify the applicable charge or category of penalty.
Analysis: The notice initiating penalty proceedings did not identify the clause of section 271AAB under which penalty was proposed. The applicable categories carried distinct statutory consequences and rates; consequently, failure to communicate the precise charge deprived the assessee of an effective opportunity to respond. The quantum assessment had also been reversed to the extent it treated the disclosed amount as unexplained investment, with the amount directed to be assessed as income from other sources at normal rates.
Conclusion: The unspecified charge rendered the initiation of penalty proceedings invalid, and the penalty levied under section 271AAB was deleted in favour of the assessee.