Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were invalid because the notice under Section 274 did not specify the applicable charge of concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.
Analysis: A penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) must clearly identify the specific default alleged against the assessee. The notice in the present case retained both statutory charges without striking off either one, leaving the assessee uncertain about the allegation to be answered. Such vagueness rendered the penalty proceedings legally unsustainable and offended the requirement of a specific notice.
Conclusion: The penalty proceedings were invalid and were quashed without examination of the merits of the penalty.