Remand for fresh factual verification in sugar cooperative disputes over cane price and concessional sugar sales.

Excess cane price paid to farmers over FRP was restored to the first appellate authority for de novo adjudication because the appellate stage had not examined the merits and the assessee had sought relief under section 155(19). Sale of sugar at concessional rate to members was also remanded because the dispute required the factual particulars identified by the Supreme Court in sugar cooperative matters, including member-wise supply and production data, and those materials were not on record. Both grounds were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with no final decision on the merits.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the disallowance relating to excess cane price paid to farmers over FRP required fresh adjudication in view of the assessee's application under section 155(19); (ii) Whether the disallowance relating to sale of sugar at concessional rate to members could be sustained without the factual verification directed by the Supreme Court.

Issue (i): Excess cane price paid to farmers over FRP

Analysis: The assessee's grievance was that the first appellate authority disposed of the ground without examining the merits, despite the statutory remedy contemplated by section 155(19) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the duty of the appellate authority to decide the appeal on the points arising from the assessment. The Tribunal noted that the issue had earlier travelled through remand proceedings and that the appellate authority had again declined substantive adjudication.

Conclusion: The issue was restored to the first appellate authority for de novo adjudication and the ground was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Sale of sugar at concessional rate to members

Analysis: The Tribunal held that the dispute could not be decided without the factual particulars identified by the Supreme Court for sugar cooperative cases, including the number of members receiving concessional sugar, whether such members had supplied cane, the crushing percentage in the relevant season, and the applicable levy sugar and excise duty rates. The Tribunal also referred to the binding effect of the State Government's directions under section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and noted that the necessary details were not on record.

Conclusion: The issue was remanded to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication with direction to call for the required material, and the ground was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal resulted in restoration of both disputed additions for fresh consideration at the appellate stage, with no final adjudication on the merits of either addition.

---