Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty proceedings under section 271E for alleged contravention of section 269T could be validly initiated in the absence of any satisfaction recorded in the assessment order under section 143(3).
Analysis: The assessment order contained no whisper or finding indicating that penalty proceedings under section 271E were to be initiated. The Tribunal applied the principle that, for valid initiation of such penalty proceedings, the assessment order must reflect the requisite satisfaction. In the absence of any such recording, the initiation of penalty proceedings was treated as illegal and bad in law. Reliance was placed on binding precedent to hold that judicial discipline required following the settled rule on satisfaction-based initiation.
Conclusion: The penalty proceedings under section 271E were held to be invalid for want of recorded satisfaction in the assessment order, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under section 271E cannot be sustained unless the assessment order records satisfaction giving rise to initiation of such penalty proceedings; absent such satisfaction, the penalty initiation is vitiated.