Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the authorities were justified in cancelling the revalidation of the Annual Advance Licence and whether the extension already granted could be denied retrospectively.
Analysis: The policy framework in the Export and Import Policy, 1997-2002 and the Handbook of Procedures, 1997-2002 was read as part of the same duty exemption and remission scheme. The revalidation clause in Chapter 7.23, the provisions relating to annual requirement licences, and the general validity and revalidation provisions in paragraphs 4.15 and 4.16 were treated as applicable to Annual Advance Licence as well. The Court further held that the scheme was a beneficial administrative policy for the relevant period, and that once export and import had been undertaken during the period of extension, the later discontinuance of the scheme could not be used to undo the validly extended licence on a retrospective basis.
Conclusion: The cancellation of revalidation was not justified and the extension of the Annual Advance Licence was held valid.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, the impugned communications were quashed, and the extended licence period was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the policy itself permits revalidation and related validity provisions are applicable to annual requirement licences, the authorities cannot retrospectively invalidate an extension already granted and acted upon during the operative policy period.