Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 26,60,211 received in the course of transactions between the assessee and its subsidiary/related company was liable to be taxed as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The transactions were found to be part of a running account with frequent receipts and payments, and the ledger reflected a current account relationship rather than a pure loan account. The issue was identical to the assessee's own case for the earlier assessment year, where the same kind of transactions had been held not to attract section 2(22)(e). In the absence of any distinguishing facts or contrary binding authority, the same view was followed.
Conclusion: The addition under section 2(22)(e) was not sustainable and was directed to be deleted. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.