Land procurement and approvals not taxable as site formation services; demand remanded for fresh adjudication and limitation review.

Land procurement from farmers and obtaining project approvals, on the record described, did not amount to taxable site formation, excavation, earth moving or demolition services under the Finance Act, 1994. The analysis states that land cost and allied non-taxable expenses could not be taxed merely because consideration was received during the project period, and that the evidence did not establish other taxable activities under the agreement. The confirmed demand was therefore not sustained in its present form, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on taxability, exclusion of land-related amounts and allied expenses, and the limitation plea.

---

---

Issues: Whether the activity of procuring land and obtaining approvals in the first phase of the project attracted service tax under the category of site formation and clearance, excavation and earth moving, and demolishing services, and whether the demand required reconsideration on remand.

Analysis: The activity found on record was confined to procurement of land from farmers and obtaining approvals from the authorities. On the evidence available, such activity did not amount to the taxable services defined under Section 65(97)(a) and Section 65(105)(zzza) of the Finance Act, 1994. The reasoning also noted that the cost of land and allied expenses excluded from taxation could not be brought to tax merely because consideration was received during the project period. Since the record did not establish that the appellant had undertaken other taxable activities covered by the agreement, the demand confirmed in the impugned order could not be sustained in its present form. The matter also required fresh consideration of the appellant's limitation plea and exclusion of non-taxable land-related amounts.

Conclusion: The demand was not sustained as confirmed and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after reconsideration of taxability, exclusion of land cost and other non-taxable expenses, and the plea relating to the extended period.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was sent back for fresh adjudication on the surviving issues.

---