Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exclusion of 60 days from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was justified, and whether the request for liquidation of the corporate debtor was liable to be accepted.
Analysis: The Committee of Creditors approved exclusion of 60 days by a very large majority after considering pending litigation, the possibility of receipt and consideration of a resolution plan, and other CIRP-related developments. The Tribunal treated the CoC's decision as an exercise of commercial wisdom, noted that liquidation is the last resort under the insolvency framework, and found that the corporate debtor still had substantial assets and a viable resolution possibility. The dissent of a small minority financial creditor was held insufficient to displace the majority view of the CoC.
Conclusion: The exclusion of 60 days was upheld and the prayer for liquidation was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed, and the orders allowing exclusion of time and declining liquidation were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A decision of the Committee of Creditors taken by overwhelming majority in favour of granting CIRP exclusion, based on continuing resolution prospects, should not be interfered with at the instance of a dissenting minority creditor, particularly where liquidation would defeat the object of resolution.