Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notices and order issued under Section 148A(b), Section 148A(d) and Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were invalid for want of compliance with the faceless mechanism contemplated under Section 151A of the Act.
Analysis: The impugned proceedings were initiated by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of through the faceless allocation mechanism required by the statutory scheme notified under Section 151A. The scheme governing issuance of notice under Section 148 is mandatory and applies to the initiation stage as well as the subsequent order under Section 148A(d). Since the authority acted contrary to the prescribed procedure, the initiation of reassessment proceedings was vitiated; no separate proof of prejudice was necessary.
Conclusion: The notices and the order were invalid for non-compliance with Section 151A and were liable to be quashed, in favour of the assessee.