Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 68 on account of share capital receipts from two companies was sustainable.
Analysis: The assessee had furnished confirmations and supporting documents for the transactions. The materials on record showed that the creditor companies were already examined in their own proceedings and no adverse finding had been recorded against them. In these circumstances, the revenue authorities could not treat the same entities as genuine in one proceeding and as accommodation entry providers in another without any defect being found in the assessee's evidence. The addition was therefore not justified.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee produces documentary evidence supporting share capital receipts and no defect is found in such evidence, an addition under section 68 cannot be sustained merely on a general allegation of accommodation entries.