Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 153C and the rejection of objections to the reassessment proceedings called for interference.
Analysis: The petitioner had earlier challenged proceedings under section 148 and obtained quashing with liberty to the tax authorities to proceed in accordance with law. In that background, the Court held that the subsequent proceedings under section 153C could not be objected to on the ground of limitation. The objections were found to have been rightly rejected, and no basis for interference with the notice was made out. The petitioner was left free to raise all available defences before the authorities, who were directed to pass a speaking order.
Conclusion: The challenge to the notice under section 153C and the order rejecting objections failed.