Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court was justified in granting bail in a case involving alleged murder pursuant to a criminal conspiracy and whether the bail order could stand despite the absence of consideration of the material collected during investigation.
Analysis: The Court held that while deciding bail, the nature of the accusation, the gravity of the offence, the prima facie evidence, and the likelihood of the accused influencing the process of justice are relevant considerations. It found that the High Court granted bail without adverting to the investigation material and without recording germane reasons. The fact that the prosecution case was based on circumstantial evidence did not, by itself, justify bail where the investigation had allegedly revealed a complete chain of events linking the accused to the offence. The Court further held that, in a case of alleged murder and conspiracy, general observations about local roots and absence of apprehension of absconding were insufficient grounds for bail.
Conclusion: The bail order was held to be unsustainable and was set aside, with the accused directed to surrender.