Delayed Form 10B filing does not automatically defeat charitable exemption where substantive eligibility is otherwise met and verification remains possible.

A delayed charitable exemption claim was not defeated merely because Form No. 10B was filed after the return, where the assessee's registration under section 12A/12AB was undisputed and the audit report was available for verification; the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification and consequential relief. The Tribunal also applied the principle that a 56-day delay in filing the appeal, being neither intentional nor inordinate and supported by a bona fide explanation, should be condoned in the interests of substantial justice. Relief was thus granted on delay, while the exemption issue was restored for reconsideration.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the delay of 56 days in filing the appeal should be condoned. (ii) Whether exemption under section 11 could be denied merely because Form No. 10B was furnished after filing the return, and whether the matter should be restored for verification.

Issue (i): Whether the delay of 56 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Analysis: The delay was treated as neither intentional nor deliberate. The appeal was pursued while the assessee was seeking the alternative remedy connected with delay condonation, and the length of delay was not considered inordinate. The Tribunal applied the settled approach that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations where the explanation is bona fide.

Conclusion: The delay in filing the appeal was condoned in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether exemption under section 11 could be denied merely because Form No. 10B was furnished after filing the return, and whether the matter should be restored for verification.

Analysis: The assessee's registration under section 12A/12AB was not in dispute. The disallowance rested only on late filing of Form No. 10B. The Tribunal relied on the line of decisions taking the view that delayed filing of the audit report does not, by itself, defeat the claim where the report is available at the relevant stage and the substantive conditions for exemption are otherwise satisfied. The matter was therefore sent back to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer to verify the filing and grant appropriate relief.

Conclusion: Denial of exemption solely on the ground of delayed Form No. 10B was not sustained, and the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and fresh consideration in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of by granting relief on the question of delay and by remitting the exemption issue for fresh verification, resulting in a statistical allowance of the assessee's appeals.

Ratio Decidendi: A delayed audit report for a charitable exemption claim does not automatically defeat relief where the substantive eligibility conditions are met and the report is available for verification; procedural delay may be condoned in the interests of substantial justice.

---