Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference petition under the Central Excise Act was maintainable before the High Court when the dispute involved valuation of goods for assessment purposes and the proper remedy lay in appeal to the Supreme Court.
Analysis: The dispute before the Tribunal concerned the value of Lead Acid Batteries for excise assessment, which was a question relating to valuation of goods. In view of Section 35H read with Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, such a question was held to fall outside the High Court's reference jurisdiction and to be appealable only to the Supreme Court. As the petition sought reference of an issue that was not maintainable in the High Court, the question of penalty did not alter the jurisdictional bar.
Conclusion: The reference petition was held to be not maintainable before the High Court and was rejected.