Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisionary order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained when the alleged infirmity in the assessment was founded on a DVO valuation report received after completion of the assessment and not forming part of the assessment records.
Analysis: The power under section 263 can be exercised only on examination of the assessment records and on finding that the assessment order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. A document not available to the Assessing Officer at the time of assessment and not forming part of the record cannot be the foundation for invoking revisionary jurisdiction. Since the DVO report was received after the assessment order and was not part of the material before the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner could not rely on it to hold the assessment erroneous. The assessment was, therefore, not shown to be unsustainable on the basis of the record actually available at the time of completion of assessment.
Conclusion: The revision under section 263 was held unsustainable and was quashed.