Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clubbing, consolidation or bunching of multiple tax periods in a single composite show-cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is permissible, and whether the impugned notice and consequential proceedings were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The Court followed its earlier decision on the same legal question and held that a solitary or composite show-cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years under Section 74 is impermissible in law. Since the notice in question covered multiple periods and was founded on the same invalid mode of issuance, the notice and all proceedings flowing from it were treated as vitiated. The Court also preserved the respondents' liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The composite notice and consequential proceedings were quashed as illegal and without jurisdiction, and the petition was allowed.