Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay of 29 days in filing Form No. 10B for claiming exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ought to have been condoned under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The delay in filing Form No. 10B was short and was supported by an explanation founded on the illness of the accountant responsible for maintaining the records and coordinating the audit process. The factual basis offered for the delay was not disputed by the Revenue. The audit report was already on record when the return was processed, and the denial of exemption would cause substantial hardship despite the absence of any wilful default or attempt to evade tax. In such circumstances, the requirement of timely filing of the audit report was treated as procedural, and the authority was expected to adopt a justice-oriented rather than a pedantic approach while exercising the power to condone delay.
Conclusion: The delay ought to have been condoned and the refusal to condone it was unsustainable. The Petitioner was entitled to the benefit of exemption under Section 11.