Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest expenditure incurred on drawings from one partnership firm could be set off against interest income from capital contribution in another partnership firm, and whether the matter required verification of the nexus between the expenditure and the income.
Analysis: Interest received by a partner from a firm falls within section 28(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and expenditure incurred to earn such income may be allowable under section 37(1) if the necessary nexus is established. The disallowance could not be sustained merely by treating the income as exempt share of profits or by applying the cited precedent on a different factual situation. Since the Assessing Officer had not examined whether the drawings from one firm were in fact used for making the capital contribution in the other firm, factual verification was necessary.
Conclusion: The disallowance was not upheld as a matter of law, and the issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification of nexus and consequential allowance, if established.