Bogus purchase additions limited to income element when the tribunal's factual estimate is supported by record.

In bogus purchase disputes, only the income element embedded in the disputed purchases is taxable, and the appellate tribunal's factual estimate will ordinarily stand unless a substantial question of law arises. On the facts, the Tribunal restricted the addition to 6% after assessing the material on record, the alleged accommodation entry nature of the purchases, and comparable decisions involving the same group. The High Court accepted that reasoning, held that the Revenue's challenge raised no substantial question of law, and left the Tribunal's order undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in restricting the addition on account of bogus purchases to 6% and whether any substantial question of law arose for consideration in the Revenue's appeal.

Analysis: The addition arose from purchases alleged to be non-genuine from an accommodation entry provider. The Tribunal had reduced the disallowance from 100% to 6% on appreciation of the facts and comparable decisions involving the same group. The Court found that the Tribunal's view was based on material on record and on a reasoned evaluation of the income element embedded in the disputed purchases. It also noted that similar issues had already been decided against the Revenue in comparable matters.

Conclusion: The restriction of the addition to 6% was upheld, and the Revenue's challenge did not give rise to any substantial question of law.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the impugned order of the Tribunal was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: In cases involving bogus purchases, only the income element can be brought to tax, and a factual estimate of that element by the appellate tribunal will not be interfered with in appeal absent a substantial question of law.

---