Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additions made on account of alleged penny stock transactions and related commission could be sustained when the assessee had not claimed any exempt long-term capital gain under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee had not claimed any exempt long-term capital gain in the return of income. The transaction in the relevant shares reflected positive income, which was offered to tax. In the absence of any claim for exempt income, there was no basis to invoke section 10(38) or sustain the related additions, including the alleged commission for obtaining accommodation entries.
Conclusion: The additions were not sustainable and the deletion made by the first appellate authority was upheld. The Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The assessment additions arising from the alleged penny stock arrangement could not survive since no exempt capital gain was claimed by the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no exempt long-term capital gain is claimed, additions cannot be sustained on the premise that such exempt income ought to have been disallowed or taxed.