Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be permitted to seek restoration of GST registration by filing an application before the competent authority and whether limitation could be raised to defeat consideration of such application on merits.
Analysis: The petitioner expressed readiness to complete the formalities required for restoration of registration under the Goods and Services Tax regime. The Court directed the petitioner to file an application before the competent authority, requiring that authority to decide the matter in accordance with law within four weeks of receipt. The Court also protected the application from rejection on the ground of limitation and recorded the petitioner's undertaking to clear dues and taxes within four weeks from the date of decision.
Conclusion: The petitioner was relegated to the statutory authority for restoration of registration, and limitation was directed not to stand in the way of consideration on merits.