Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the SOP issued for constitution of the Local Committee required it to grant a personal hearing and whether the earlier order dismissing the writ petition called for review.
Analysis: The SOP was understood as a mechanism only for constituting a Local Committee to examine whether a case fell within the category of high-pitched assessment. The Local Committee was not treated as an alternate forum for dispute resolution or appellate proceedings. On the facts, the Committee examined the grievance on the material before it, concluded that the case did not fall within the ambit of high-pitched assessment, and communicated that decision. As the applicant had already availed the statutory appellate remedy, no error was found in the earlier order declining interference.
Conclusion: The claim of entitlement to a hearing before the Local Committee was rejected, and the review application was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The earlier dismissal of the writ petition remained undisturbed, and no ground was found to reopen the matter in review.
Ratio Decidendi: A Local Committee constituted under an administrative SOP to screen high-pitched assessment grievances is not an appellate or dispute-resolution forum, and absence of a personal hearing before it does not by itself vitiate its determination.