Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made by treating the long-term capital gains from sale of shares as unexplained income and the consequential commission disallowance were sustainable.
Analysis: The sale and purchase of shares were supported by documentary evidence, including demat entries, banking channels, and contract-linked transactions, and the holding period satisfied the character of long-term capital gain. The addition was founded mainly on a general investigation report and an alleged penny-stock modus operandi, without any independent inquiry linking the assessee to price manipulation, exit providers, or other direct adverse material. Mere abnormal price rise, suspicion, or borrowed findings could not displace the assessee's evidence in the absence of cogent material controverting the genuineness of the transaction.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 and the consequential disallowance under section 69C were deleted, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A supported share transaction cannot be treated as bogus accommodation income merely on the basis of suspicion or a general investigation report unless the Revenue brings specific, cogent material and independent inquiry linking the assessee to manipulation or sham dealings.