Expenditure against gross receipts under summary processing must be examined before taxing income where exemption is unavailable.

Under summary processing of a return, absence of registration under section 12AA prevented exemption under section 11, but it did not justify taxing gross receipts without examining the assessee's expenditure claim. The Tribunal accepted that an alternate claim for deduction of expenditure could not be rejected merely because the return contained a technical mistake, and the Assessing Officer was required to verify the expenditure and allow it in accordance with law. Relief was therefore confined to recomputation after considering the expenditure actually claimed, rather than assessment of gross receipts alone.

---

---

Issues: Whether, in processing a return under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the assessee, though not registered under section 12AA and therefore denied exemption under section 11, could still claim deduction of expenditure from gross receipts and have only the net income brought to tax.

Analysis: The assessee's return was processed under section 143(1) on the basis that exemption under section 11 was unavailable because registration under section 12AA was absent. The Tribunal held that while an incorrect claim apparent from the return could be dealt with in summary processing, the alternate plea that expenditure ought to be allowed against gross receipts could not be defeated merely because the assessee had made a technical mistake in the return. It was considered that the assessee should not be denied the benefit of expenditure actually claimed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to examine the expenditure and allow it in accordance with law.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the gross receipts were not to be taxed without examining and allowing eligible expenditure.

Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed, with relief confined to recomputation after consideration of the assessee's expenditure claim.

---