Customs classification of therapeutic bandages upheld; redemption fine deleted when goods were unavailable, penalty sustained

Imported orthopedic synthetic castings and pop bandages were treated as bandage-like articles impregnated or coated with pharmaceutical substances for therapeutic use, so classification under Heading 3005 of the Customs Tariff Act was upheld over Heading 9021 10 00. On confiscation consequences, redemption fine could not be retained because the goods were recorded as not available, but penalty remained sustainable where the goods were still liable to confiscation. The adjudication also recognised the statutory option to pay 25% of the penalty. The result was limited relief only by deletion of redemption fine, with reclassification and penalty otherwise sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the imported orthopedic synthetic castings and pop bandages were correctly classified under Heading 3005 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 instead of Heading 9021 10 00; (ii) Whether redemption fine and the full penalty were sustainable when the goods were not available for confiscation.

Issue (i): Whether the imported orthopedic synthetic castings and pop bandages were correctly classified under Heading 3005 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 instead of Heading 9021 10 00.

Analysis: The goods were found to be bandage-like articles impregnated or coated with pharmaceutical substances, intended for specific therapeutic use and not in the nature of orthopedic appliances. On that basis, the classification adopted in the impugned order was found to be consistent with the tariff description and explanatory notes.

Conclusion: The classification under Heading 3005 was upheld and the challenge to reclassification failed.

Issue (ii): Whether redemption fine and the full penalty were sustainable when the goods were not available for confiscation.

Analysis: Since the adjudication order itself recorded that the goods were not available, redemption fine could not be retained. At the same time, the goods remained liable to confiscation and penalty was maintainable, though the statutory option for reduced payment was available.

Conclusion: Redemption fine was set aside, the penalty was upheld, and the option to pay 25% of the penalty was granted.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of deletion of redemption fine, while the reclassification and penalty were sustained with the statutory concession on penalty payment.

Ratio Decidendi: Redemption fine cannot be sustained where confiscated goods are not available, but penalty may still be upheld if the goods are liable to confiscation.

---