Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of incriminating material found during search in the assessee's premises and in the presence of a retracted statement, an addition could be sustained in proceedings initiated under section 153A, and whether the addition based on third-party material was legally maintainable.
Analysis: The search in the assessee's premises yielded no incriminating material. The addition was founded mainly on material seized during the search of a third party and on the statement of the assessee's director, which was later retracted. The proceedings under section 153A cannot be used to make additions for completed or unabated assessments unless incriminating material is found against the assessee during search. A statement recorded during search may be relevant, but it cannot by itself sustain an addition without corroborative material. Where material belongs to or relates to another person, the proper recourse is section 153C, not section 153A. The statutory requirement of a nexus between the seized material and the assessee was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The addition was not sustainable, the invocation of section 153A was held to be bad in law, and the relief was granted to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In search assessments, no addition can be made in respect of a completed or unabated assessment under section 153A in the absence of incriminating material found against the assessee, and a retracted statement or third-party material alone cannot substitute for such material.