Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal complaint alleging cheating and common intention against the petitioners, arising out of business transactions and alleged suppression of liquidation proceedings, should be quashed.
Analysis: The allegations disclose that the petitioners allegedly entered into business dealings by suppressing material facts regarding the company's liquidation and by making representations about its financial soundness. The Court noted that the complaint also alleged outstanding liability and a cheque-related dispute, and that the question whether the business transactions continued after liquidation by suppressing that fact involves appreciation of evidence. The contention that the matter was purely commercial and that the ingredients of cheating were absent was held to require trial, not quashing at the threshold. The Court also observed that related proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act were pending and that the petitioners' cited decisions did not assist them on the facts.
Conclusion: The complaint was not liable to be quashed and the petition was dismissed. The petitioners were, however, granted dispensation from personal appearance considering their age.