Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the buyer was ready and willing to perform the contract and was entitled to the discretionary relief of specific performance despite the contractual time stipulation.
Analysis: The agreement contained a stipulation that the balance consideration was to be paid within four months and also a clause requiring vacant possession after eviction of tenants. Reading the document as a whole, the latter clause qualified the former, and the time stipulation could not be treated as absolute in the circumstances. Even so, a suit for specific performance required strict proof of continuous readiness and willingness. The buyer failed to demonstrate financial capacity, did not comply with repeated opportunities to complete the transaction, raised unsupported demands not found in the agreement, and retained the returned demand draft until the last day of its validity. These circumstances cumulatively negatived readiness and willingness and weighed against the grant of an equitable decree.
Conclusion: The buyer was not entitled to specific performance, and the grant of such relief by the first appellate court was unsustainable.