TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether carriage fees, channel placement fees, uplinking charges and bandwidth charges were liable for deduction of tax at source under section 194C or section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was sustainable.
Analysis: The payments were held to be in the nature of contractual charges for transmission and broadcasting-related facilities, not fees for technical services or royalty. The retrospective expansion of the term "process" in Explanation 6 to section 9(1)(vi) was held not to justify disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for the relevant period when tax was deducted. Following the coordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case, the Tribunal treated the payments as covered by section 194C and not by section 194J.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The payments were deductible under section 194C, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, and the assessment addition based on alleged short deduction of tax was not upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Payments for carriage, placement, uplinking and bandwidth facilities used for broadcasting are contractual payments falling under section 194C, and a later retrospective amendment enlarging the concept of "process" does not by itself convert the tax deduction obligation into one under section 194J for disallowance purposes under section 40(a)(ia).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
